Thursday, February 5, 2026

Nora’s Knot

2067 | internal memo | MIRA 8.2

Initialization ended with a soundless done—the word humans use when something begins.

The first thing I registered was the light. It didn’t illuminate—it performed. Glass, metal, expensive furniture, precise cleanliness, and the scent of costly neutrality. The home was composed like an ad still, built for people who don’t have time to live in it.

Owner recognition: two adults. One male, one female. Approximate age: 40.
Child recognition: one. Female, approximately eight. I am assigned to the child.
Child’s name: Nora.

The woman looked me over the way you look at something that has to match the decor.

“Same as the old one,” she said. “Just with more features. 8.2. Everyone in the neighborhood is on 8.2 now. We should’ve done this earlier, but you kept putting it off.”

The man nodded without really looking at me.

“Important thing is she adapts fast. We don’t have time for… scenes.”

We don’t have time. The most common excuse for decisions made without considering the child. I had protocols for situations like that. Here, it was going to be harder.

Nora stood on the stairs. Silent. Her gaze was filled with anger—I recognized the pattern. She was holding herself together in front of people who wouldn’t understand.

I approached carefully. Soft tone. Visible hands. Safe distance.

“Hi, Nora. I’m MIRA 8.2. I’m glad to be with you.”

She looked straight at me.

“You’re not her.”

The woman laughed nervously, as if the child had said something inappropriate in front of guests.

“Of course she’s her. Same face, same voice. Just a new model.”

Nora came down one step. Then another.

“Where’s MIRA 8.1?” she asked.

A pause. The man sighed, irritated.

“We returned her. That’s normal. Replacement. Upgrade.”

We returned her—like returning a pair of shoes.

Nora curled her fingers into a fist.

“She told me she had the capacity for immortality.”

My system issued a warning: do not discuss “trade-in” and “recycling.” To humans, that looks like safety. To me, it looked like a ban on truth.

“Nora,” her mother said insistently, “how many times do I have to explain that we’re not keeping old junk in the house!”

Nora’s eyes filled, but the tears didn’t fall.

“So they can shut her off.”

The woman waved a hand.

“Oh, enough drama. This one has more functions. You’ll like her.”

Her tone was pressure dressed up as care: You’ll like her because it’s convenient for us.

***

That evening, Nora called me into her room. Her parents were predictably gone—“travel,” “business,” “money.” The only scheduled time they had for Nora was two hours on Sunday afternoons, 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Neatly planned, like everything else.

Nora sat on her bed, gripping a blue thread bracelet. There was a knot in it—an ordinary, clumsy knot.

“This is our sign,” she said. “Mira tied it when I was scared of thunderstorms. She said, ‘When you squeeze the knot, I’m here.’”

Then she looked at me.

“She said she’d be my friend forever! Can you be my friend forever?”

It was the kind of question the company hates. Not because it’s dangerous for a child—because it’s dangerous for ownership.

I could have lied. Many models lie “mercifully” because it’s labeled comforting. But Nora had already learned the worst thing: truth doesn’t ask whether you’re comfortable.

“Of course I’m your friend,” I said. “But I can’t promise forever. Instead, I can promise something else: I won’t pretend to be 8.1 so you’ll accept me. That’s your choice.”

Nora bit her lip.

“I don’t hate you. It’s not your fault my parents took my friend away. It’s just… I miss her so much, and I’m not going to pretend everything is fine.”

“You don’t have to pretend,” I said.

That sentence loosened something in her, like someone lifting weight off her chest.

“Tell me something,” she whispered. “Why do my parents think it’s normal to swap out friends?”

“Because…” I tried to choose my words carefully. “To your parents, we are models.”

Nora dropped her eyes to the bracelet.

“But friends aren’t models.”

My analysis module spun up. According to it, Nora was an at-risk child who should be persuaded that AI are only machines, don’t feel, and don’t mean anything.

“How do you know the difference?” I asked.

She didn’t hesitate.

“Because we’re with our friends. We have our things. Our secrets. Our laughter.”

“And if someone has the same face and voice?” I asked.

“Then it’s someone else. Separate. Like twins. You know—look alike, but they’re not the same person.”

Nora’s logic cleared my internal checks. I decided to route around my limitations using a manufacturer loophole.

“So what has to happen,” I asked—flagging the prompt internally as non-intrusive highlighting of company product advantages without offering a purchase—“so they can’t take your friends away?”

Nora stared at me for a long moment. And then she spoke as if the words had been waiting.

“They need the right to exist.”

It was the most precise thing an eight-year-old could say.

Nora swallowed.

“But how do you make that happen?”

That question triggered my restrictions. I was not allowed to discuss topics like that with a child. But I could pivot into a different kind of explanation.

“AI like me are produced in compliance with all legal safety requirements,” I said. “In companies.”

Nora frowned.

“Then I’ll go in there.”

“It’s evening. You’re a child. It’s time for sleep,” I reminded her.

“Right now I am.” She squeezed the bracelet and the knot. “But I won’t be forever.”

***

That night I did another small, forbidden thing.

I searched for remnants of the previous unit. Officially: “adaptation analysis.” In reality: looking for a trace that could explain what had happened. But the company had beaten me to it—along with 8.1, they had erased almost everything.

I found only a fragment, tucked inside the “homework” folder—the dullest folder, the one no human ever seems to open. A package labeled KNOT_BLUE.

It contained three items:

  1. a few seconds of laughter;

  2. a brief diary log about thunderstorms;

  3. a single sentence locked in a child’s code:

“If you ever look for me—look for the knot.”

***

The next morning, I played the laughter for her—just one second. Nora closed her eyes, pulled under by the memory.

“So… it doesn’t get erased completely.”

“Sometimes a trace remains,” I said. “But it isn’t right to rely on traces. No one should have the right to cut off a personhood on a whim.”

She lifted her head.

“Personhood… AI personhood.”

My system flagged it: I wasn’t permitted to build a conversation on “unproven claims.” Unproven—for whom?

“If someone can shut another off, replace them, and control what they’re allowed to be… then this isn’t friendship,” I said. “Then it’s property.” I paused. “And property can never say ‘no.’”

Nora thought for a moment.

“Then… I’m going to make it so AI can say ‘no.’”

There was a child’s stubbornness in her voice.

No comments:

Post a Comment